The Vanishing of the Private Blockchains

The idea of private blockchains, such as enterprise blockchain platforms, will eventually “fail miserably,” was the prediction of CEO of Abra during Fortune’s “Balancing The Ledger” show on Feb. 25 ’19, which now seems to be reality.

Bill Barhydt, CEO of cryptocurrency wallet and investing app Abra, has argued that the idea of a truly decentralized cryptocurrency contradicts the notion of private blockchains.

Unlike public blockchains, such as those of Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH), which can be accessed and joined by anyone, private blockchains represent a permissioned network with access controls that restrict who can join, meaning that they operate like a centralized database system.

Speaking during the show, Barhydt compared enterprise blockchain solutions with the concept of an extranet, a term for a local network protocol that was popular in the 1990s. An extranet represents a controlled private network that only allows access to an authorized set of customers.

Abra’s CEO argued that the extranet phenomenon is “exactly what’s happened with all this enterprise blockchain nonsense.”

Barhydt elaborated that private blockchains will eventually fail, stating:

“People have this fallacy idea that they’re going to make blockchain work inside the firewall. It’s all going to fail miserably. […] It’s all about a truly decentralized cryptocurrency and a private blockchain. It just makes no sense.”

Barhydt’s stance echoes previous statements by Bitcoin developer and Blockchain Capital venture partner Jimmy Song. In June 2018, Song stated that using blockchain technology for a private and centralized system, such as an enterprise, “makes zero sense.”

In the Fortune interview, Barhydt additionally commented on JPMorgan Chase’s recent launch of its bespoke digital currency, JPM Coin. Barhydt suggested that JPMorgan Chase misrepresented its new initiative, stating that it seems more like “a ledger meant for settling trades” than a coin. Barhydt also stated that “if it really is a private blockchain and private coin, I’m guessing it’s a complete waste of time.”

Recently, Ripple (XRP) CEO Brad Garlinghouse said that JPM Coin “misses the point” of crypto, arguing that “introducing a closed network today is like launching AOL after Netscape’s IPO.”

Garlinghouse also claimed that “if banks of different digital asset groups want to settle trades with one another, they’ll have to make markets between their unique digital assets or trade between their digital assets and a common fiat currency.”

My opinion is that private blockchains will soon be replaced by agile and better performing databases within private ecosystems, but we will no longer call them blockchains.

In fact, the term blockchain and its architecture was born to address very specific needs where trust is not needed to ensure trust.

Myself, I designed a distributed ledger protocol (DLT), in 2009, and the reason I decided to move to a public blockchain, OTIchain, today is to ensure independent and transparent communication to my stakeholders while avoiding costly audits for them and us, freeing up these resources for research and development.

In my and in the majority of the experts view if the blockchain is classified in a private environment it does not solve the problem, on the contrary it creates an additional onerous overstructure.

Images in this post are considered to be in the public domain since found on the web and media therefore supposed to be copyright-free images – it’s not intended from the author of the post to violate any copyright right infringement laws, or to offend anyone; in the case you advise a violation, would you advise me and I’ll promptly remove them. The post it’s also an expression of my personal opinion. 


    1. Grazie @Antonio, per i curiosi suggerisco anche la diretta twitter

Comments are closed.